SHN

The Sheltered Housing Network

Supporting All Involved in The Provision of Sheltered and Supported Housing

Home ] About SHN ] Best Practice ] Bulletin Board ] Clients Comments ] Contact Us ] FAQ's ] Feedback ] Job Ops ] Price List ] Search ] Services ] Sheltered Hsg Info ] SHN Membership ] Training ] Workshop Reports ]

Info/Communication Technology

 

[Up]

INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY

and

RESIDENTS OF SHELTERED HOUSING

A Workshop

University of Sussex, Brighton

Friday 29th September 2000, 10.00am ‑ 4.30pm

Sheltered Housing ‑ Sheltered from what? Not surely from benefits of modem technology ‑ and especially Information and Communication Technology (ICT) ‑ which, however daunting it may appear to older people, can greatly improve their quality of life. Whilst increasing numbers of older people, and especially men and those from the higher social grades, now own a PC, the majority of those who do not allege that they are not interested and that ICT has nothing to offer them.

Sheltered housing can, however, offer a stimulating environment wherein ICT may be introduced to older people. Equipment may be communally owned or shared; residents may provide mutual support and assistance to each other.

In the morning session of this workshop speakers presented six case studies of projects in which they were involved. These projects varied widely in their approach ‑ some involved providing 'taster sessions' both in sheltered housing and in other communal settings, others focussed exclusively on one or more sheltered schemes. They exemplified the scores of projects which are currently underway throughout Britain; yet the project leaders appeared to have little knowledge of, or contact with, other projects similar to their own. There is much 're‑inventing of the wheel'.

The afternoon session was facilitated by Teresa Gittins, Head of Rural Enterprise at the Sussex Rural Community Council. The SRCC is heavily involved in economic regeneration of rural areas and, as part of its programme, has established telecottages/resource centres in small villages, with the aim of stimulating employment prospects. The SRCC has published Providing Public Access to Computers and the Internet: a guide for voluntary organisations and community groups (by Melanie Bowles, December 1999),. Using the headings employed in this guide Teresa elicited from the workshop participants further material from their own experiences. Clearly there is much in the guide that pertains equally to sheltered housing; but there is much too that is specific to the latter. The purpose of this workshop was therefore to provide a parallel guide focussing on older people in sheltered housing.

This Report gives brief outlines of the six projects presented to the workshop. Much of the material on how the projects were/are being carried out has been aggregated in the subsequent section where the general principles of our own guide are set out. Much material from the case studies and the afternoon session overlapped and was repetitious.

Whilst we feel that we covered a vast amount of ground, a day workshop is insufficient to explore fully all the issues involved. This Report, circulated to all participants and others interested, is seen as an 'interim report'. Comments and contributions are welcome and will be incorporated into a subsequent, more polished version.

 

  • CASE STUDIES

    The six projects presented were varied in approach. Some illustrated the 'taster sessions' provided not only to sheltered housing residents but also to other groups of older people, in clubs, day centres, etc. In others the object was to establish ICT usage specifically within sheltered housing schemes. Each project provided valuable lessons.

    In each of our projects the initiative came from without ‑ from the landlord agency managing sheltered housing, from a voluntary agency or activist. In none of these projects did the initial initiative come from residents within a scheme; but there is no reason why it should not ‑ one purpose of a workshop such as ours is to stimulate residents to explore the possibilities of introducing ICT within their own schemes.

    Frances Cambrook: Bournemouth University/McCarthy and Stone

    As a researcher Frances Cambrook has been studying technological change through oral history; she has also been teaching the use of the internet to students. Consequent upon an oral history project she was invited by McCarthy and Stone (a major private sector provider of retirement housing) to investigate the introduction of ICT into five of their schemes in central‑south England. If successful, McCarthy and Stone would introduce ICT facilities into their schemes and advertise them accordingly.

    Refurbished computers were obtained for each scheme (all of the five selected participated but one did not retain the computer afterwards). Sponsorship sources resulted in two servers being used ‑Freeserve and ncl. Printers were not available within the existing funding ‑ two schemes purchased their own. In each scheme 15‑20 residents participated in the project.

    Two full day training sessions were given in each scheme, separated by a two week interval. The morning of each session was devoted to 'theory', the afternoon to 'practice' in groups of three. The first session dealt with the internet, the second e‑mail. Homework exercises were given for the intervening fortnight.

    Funding did not permit further formal sessions, but Frances made voluntary visits to the schemes as and when time and itineraries allowed. A final visit to each scheme concluded the project.

    Feedback on the project was positive. Several residents have bought their own computer; some have proceeded to other formal classes. Two schemes have kept their computers and of these one has formed a 'club' with some five members.

    Ann Brogan and Jenny Foulger: Watford Council/Better Government for Older People

    Ann Brogan is Housing Needs Coordinator/Sheltered Housing, and Jenny Foulger a scheme manager. In October 1997 Watford Council successfully bid for a Better Government for Older People grant under the title, 'Strategies for Older People'; the project was to install computers in all the Council's fifteen schemes and to train residents in their use.

    Refurbished computers were not forthcoming and identical machines were purchased at full cost; the Council's IT department arranged the acquisition of the computers and their installation. Most schemes have purchased a printer from their social club funds.

    In a pilot in Jenny's scheme a questionnaire introduced residents to the project. A volunteer trainer ‑an older person ‑ visited each Monday to give one‑to‑one training at arranged hours. About ten residents were involved in the training though others were passive observers. The computers are accessible throughout the day for residents to practice their skills.

    At present each scheme has from four to six residents who are regularly using the computer. Management of the use of the computers is being debated in each scheme. A large local firm now has agreed to sponsor the training of residents as a community project.

    Teresa Gallagher: Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation/Training for Life, NIACE

    Teresa Gallagher is Deputy Care Services Manager in the Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation's sheltered housing scheme of 138 flats for ex‑servicemen, many of whom have disabilities. Trainingfor Life had been renting a room in the scheme to train 16‑24 year olds in computer skills. They carried out a questionnaire survey of the older residents in the scheme and offered spare time and access to their computers to train them in ICT. A successful bid to the Adult and Community Learning Fund administered by the DfEE and NIACE has provided two computers and a part time project manager for two years.

    The project manager is about to begin in this post; but she has been a volunteer and then a paid tutor for some months; she is a trained teacher and well known to the Foundation.

    Three computers and two printers are now installed in the scheme's Garden Room where newspapers and tea are also available. They are freely accessible throughout the day and are now in regular use. The tutor provides one‑to‑one training sessions of one hour, to residents on request. Ten sessions seem sufficient to establish confidence to proceed with little additional help. Initially the training focuses on e‑mail and the Internet but will later cover more complex processes. SOSF will recruit volunteers to provide additional training and expertise. The target is to train eighty residents in basic skills.

    Sue Warr: Age Concern Bournemouth/Age Resource

    Sue Warr is Development and Information Officer at Age Concern Bournemouth. In 1997 ACB set up a Resource Desk as part of a programme initiated by Age Resource ‑ a unit within the national Age Concern England. This Desk provided information to callers from its computer data base on a very wide variety of topics. Subsequently ACB invited older people into its offices for one‑to‑one ICT training. This proved so successful that the Internet Outreach Project was established; a kit ‑ of laptop computer, multi media power point projector and printer ‑ is taken to a wide variety of community groups (sheltered housing, day centres, private rest homes etc.) for a 1 1/2hour 'taster session'. A minimum of four participants is required, a maximum of 24. In these sessions the first half hour deals with basic principles, the second with e‑mail and the final period with the Internet.

    The training is carried out by volunteers ‑ mostly older people ‑ recruited via media advertisement. A very large response led to the selection of five (now seven) volunteers who each received two full days training by Age Resource. These volunteers work in pairs ‑ to share the carrying load and to prompt each other.

    Sue Warr collects individual evaluation forms from participants and now has some 160 responses, testifying to the success of the scheme; many participants have proceeded to further training. One ACB volunteer takes classes to bring older people up to the standard which they feel necessary to join formal classes. There continues to be a large number of requests for the 'taster sessions'. ACB is actively involved in collaborative projects promoting ICT use by older people.

    Gwyneth Bryant and lan Betts: Age Concern East Sussex/Age Resource

    Gwyneth Bryant is Development and Information Officer, and lan Betts a volunteer, at Age Concern East Sussex (located in Lewes). Here too an Age Resource Desk was established in 1997 but with little success. An open day for ICT training was advertised locally; 58 people wished to attend. Nine of these were accommodated in a single workshop whilst the remainder were offered one to one sessions. The success of this led to the recruitment of lan Betts to take taster sessions to a wide variety of venues.

    A taster session at a senior citizens' club in Bexhill led to a series of weekly sessions. Some members bought their own computers and two now attend classes in a further education college. A local firm has provided a computer and offers support to club members. These now offer their own taster sessions and envisage the development of a cybercafe. Similar developments are taking place at social services day centres, a bowls club, a day hospital, a sheltered housing complex...

    Peter Stanley: Woodingdean Open House, Brighton

    Peter Stanley has been active within the community for 40 years, and involved with computers for nearly as long. He is now retired. Initially he worked with Age Concern Brighton in establishing its Resource Desk, but this did not develop; nor did a proposal to open a cybercafe.

    In the past two years he has worked with a colleague on a number of projects in his locality. They respond to local requests rather than work to a pre‑defined programme; Peter describes himself as a facilitator rather than an organiser. He and his colleagues are not constrained by bureaucratic red‑tape. Participants in the projects are able, and encouraged, to work at their own pace. With little external funding and sponsors to be accountable to, local groups and projects can work informally.

    Peter and his colleagues have built up a core of volunteers, older persons, who undertake a wide range of training. Three are retired engineers who would like to be trained to maintain computers and equipment and to trouble‑shoot; this has yet to be arranged.

    Initially, for about three months, the group were able to borrow six lap tops one day a week from Brighton & Hove Council. Subsequently they were able to acquire four new PCs (with Lottery funding) used for training sessions, and now have another six that they are able to loan out for up to six weeks so that students can practice at home.

    A varied array of activities now take place within the locality: a computer club for the over 50s recruited through a leaflet drop, a club within the sheltered housing scheme, an afternoon drop‑in centre, an evening club, together with individual tutorial sessions, usually of two hour duration spaced to allow practice between sessions.

    THE GUIDE

    1. Why should older people get involved in ICT? What is in it for them? What benefits might they gain? The answers come both from the older people themselves, describing how they use ICT or what they want from it; and from external advocates who argue how it could benefit older people.

    1.1  Uses

    a) e-mail:

    bullet

    many sheltered housing residents live distant from close kin and friends, and communication with them is problematic

    bullet

    with arthritic hands letter writing becomes more difficult, and handwriting less legible

    bullet

    long distant telephone calls are expensive

    bullet

    e-mail promotes a rapid, if less personal, response; it is an easier and cheaper mode of communication

    bullet

    e-mail clearly tops the list of current ICT usage

    b) the internet:

    bullet the internet provides an encyclopedic store of knowledge and information; for example:
    bullet about local community activities
    bullet about health issues
    bullet about similar interest groups (e.g. crafts and hobbies, politics ... ), with the possibilities of communicating with these groups

    c) shopping:

    bullet the widely advertised possibilities of shopping via the internet do not, as yet, seem to have taken off; many people still like to see and feel what they are buying; they fear their credit card number will be fraudulently used; (it could be so used in everyday shopping!)
    bullet shopping by telephone is an alternative; in one London borough home care assistants no longer shop personally for their clients but encourage tele‑shopping; collective shopping is facilitated in some day centres
    bullet he booking of holidays via the internet may increase in popularity as it rivals the high‑street travel agents' ability to select the cheapest or most attractive options.

    d) games:

    bullet

    game playing may be either a solitary activity or an interactive pursuit

    Benefits.

    bullet

    ICT can reduce isolation, especially of those who are largely housebound; it brings them into contact with the outside world; they understand the realities of the outside world, even though they may not participate; (even if they do not wish to play computer games with their grand children, they do at least appreciate what they are doing!)

    bullet

    conversely it is feared that some users might retire to their screens in their own rooms and reduce their interaction with others, their friends and neighbours

    bullet

    a computer in the communal lounge is viewed as a focus of activity (in an often little used area); friends will chat with users, enjoy a cup of tea. (The laundry usually fulfils a similar social function)

    bullet

    management of the computer facilities provides another stimulus for resident participation (along with organising outings, the Christmas party, annual fete etc.).

    bullet

    ICT stimulates mental activity and this almost certainly benefits health and feelings of well‑being

    bullet

    ICT can dispel the myths of aging. Speakers and participants provided many examples of the activities of older residents; to note but one example: Doris is in her late 80s. She had no previous experience of computers; she began to attend 2 hour weekly classes in her scheme and after 6 weeks her children bought her a computer; she attended 20 weekly classes; she has recently downloaded all Monet's paintings to fulfil her interest; she uses some of the pictures to make her own greetings cards; she writes poetry; a year after her own first lesson she has returned to the beginners class ‑ as its tutor.

    2. Impediments to learning

    2.1  Most older people are not computer literate; their reluctance to remedy this can be summed up as fear:

    bullet

    they do not understand the technology and its terminology - so different from the scientific principles learned at school, if at all, six decades previously  

    bullet

    they lack confidence in being able to keep up with others in a tutorial group, feeling that their slowness will inconvenience others and bring shame on themselves

    bullet

    many do, in fact, have physical impairments ‑ arthritic limbs and poor eyesight resulting in difficulties in using keyboard and mouse, in seeing the screen.

    bullet

    many websites are very poorly designed; they are not user‑friendly even for the average user and can be most unfriendly for those with poor eyesight

    bullet

    conscious of the costs of using the telephone, they believe that a more 'hightech' facility will, ultimately, be even more expensive

    2.2  Speakers and participants suggested that many of these fears were either  groundless, or could be overcome:

    bullet some adolescents were reported as asserting that, mentally,  older people could  learn as fast as their own age group; they were impeded only by their physical impairments
    bullet most trainers report that older people need a longer period to become proficient
    bullet in physical tasks ‑ e.g. in using the mouse
    bullet older people should, preferably, be taught by their age‑peers ‑ who will understand their fears, and tolerate any slowness
    bullet it was suggested that men and women learn differently; men are more goal  oriented, and prefer to practice in isolation whilst women see learning as a social
    bullet the average age of group members may be a significant factor in group activity; the younger the group, the faster they learn; (illustrations of the success of older people must modify this assumption)
    bullet many older people do have physical impairments ‑ but these can be remedied, e.g. larger white keyboards, screen magnification; it was emphasised that individual needs could vary widely within categories, and that the standard equipment recommended perhaps by a disability association might not always be the most appropriate
    bullet older people who can type may have an advantage over those who cannot

    3. The role of scheme manager (aka warden, estate/house manager)

    bullet

    the attitude of the scheme manager is very probably important; a keen manager can stimulate activity among the residents, or can through their own apathy discourage it.

    bullet

    factors involved here might include:

    bullet

    the scheme manger is computer literate, either through past experience or through having a computer in the office, provided by employers

    bullet

    the scheme manager has no computer in the office but hopes that the residents' possession of one will encourage the employer to provide one in the scheme office; (in the meantime the manager must be disuaded from over‑use of the residents' computer)

    bullet

    the scheme manger realises the social benefits of having a communal computer

    4. Starting a project

    The availability of 'taster sessions' is usually advertised in the local media and requests are responded to according to resources:

    bullet if a project is being established within one or more schemes, a questionnaire could be completed by all residents indicating:
    bullet their experience and knowledge of computing
    bullet what they think they would use a computer for; (they are unlikely to realise its full potential)
    bullet the taster session must incorporate demonstrations of the uses of the computer; many older people may be ignorant of the range of possibilities
    bullet when a project is set up by an external agency its members will have expertise to select hardware and software as appropriate to the purpose, being constrained however by what is available, donations etc., budgetary constraints
    bullet if residents are embarking on a project on their own initiative, or when they are taking over a project at the conclusion of a pilot run, they will need a small cadre of people with expertise to advise them; particularly re choice of equipment, comparing financial deals on offer, how to cope with breakdowns and maintenance problems; these may be found:
    bullet among the residents, with existing skills or with scientific backgrounds which might be extended
    bullet among residents' close kin who live nearby
    bullet in a small local firm which will steer the residents through the sales talk and gimmicks of the large companies, giving residents their loyal and personal attention

5.Getting the computer(s)

bullet the projects presented to the workshop were all 'pilot' projects, limited in scale but designed for replication; each had a restricted budget ‑ though some were more generous than others.
bullet most started with 'refurbished' computers; large companies update their equipment every two or three years; rather than consign the obsolete stock to the waste tip it is sold/given to a small company which will refurbish the computer and sell on/donate, especially to charities for a modest price ‑ e.g. £250. Companies cited in the workshop are listed in the appendices.
bullet it is often felt that such computers are slow and thus off‑putting to users; they may however be adequate to the needs of older people using them
bullet often a printer is not included in the package; the project/scheme must buy/acquire these independently.
bullet some project leaders/trainers found themselves unfamiliar with the donated computer and its software and had to 'retrain' themselves before working with the older people.
bullet in some cases the computer is permanently available, e.g. in the communal lounge; in other cases it is shared with other projects, taken from one taster session to another etc.; in the latter situation it is not available to learners for 'homework' and private practice.

6. The trainers/tutors

  • bullet the cost of trainers/tutors tends to be a large proportion of the project budget (especially when the computers are acquired cheaply).
    bullet the project leaders/trainers are usually ICT experts (which makes their input more costly, their available time limited!)
    bullet they may need to acquaint themselves with the software being used (see above)
    bullet they may need some training in working with older people (being used to school/college students)
    bullet many projects therefore place heavy reliance on volunteer trainers
    bullet these may be older people themselves; or as younger people they may need formal training in working with older people
    bullet peer group training is often a successful way of getting a project started
    bullet they may need training in the hardware and software used
    bullet they should form a support group meeting regularly (monthly?) with project leaders
    bullet it is frequently asserted that 'grandchildren can teach grandparents'; workshop participants felt that this is not so ‑ children do not have the patience to cope with the grandparents' initial learning stages; once the grandparent has acquired basic skills and competence, fruitful interaction is possible; (in one project a trainer sometimes brought her adolescent children and their friends to a class ‑ they were useful in giving one‑to‑one support to the learners)

    7. Training methods

    bullet

    Firstly one must generate enthusiasm among the learners;

    bullet

    this may be helped by a pre‑circulated questionnaire (see above).

    bullet

    try to arrange a spectacular event (a resident e‑mails a relative and gets an almost immediate reply; a photo of the latest grandchild is downloaded for all to admire; a picture and pattern of a jumper is displayed and all want to knit it).

    bullet

    one‑to‑one teaching is often preferred, but is obviously costly; groups of three can provide time for each individual together with mutual support; with larger groups several learners will become passive by‑standers, unable to practice their own skills and left behind in the larger group

    bullet

    'taster sessions' are single events; some projects allow for only 2 or 3 formal classes; neither brings the learners to a stage where most could be expected to continue on their own; they need the opportunity to practice, to do 'homework' exercises; provision of such opportunities seems to be a major stumbling block in most projects

    several solutions were mooted:

    bullet

    where a computer is located in the scheme's communal lounge it can be used (with times booked) for individual practice; (but some learners are reluctant to practice in public)

    bullet

    some learners may have access to a computer, their own, a relative's etc.

    bullet

    a project leader may have computers which can be loaned for three or four weeks to individual learners

    bullet

    a trainer may make voluntary visits to a class

    bullet

    most trainers provide their own training materials; (Age Resource has its own set for project use); these cover basic issues (what ICT is, what a computer does etc.), simple procedures and trouble shooting; these are used in classes and may be on laminated sheets left alongside the computer for private practice.

    bullet

    A local 'mentor' could be found and trained to support learners.

    8. Siting the computer

    bullet A 'taster session' will probably be held in the communal lounge, often as an adjunct to a coffee morning
    bullet for a training project, the communal lounge seems an obvious site for the computer as a permanent fixturelfor the duration of the course
    bullet for many residents it will become a focus of social activity
    bullet other residents may complain that the quiet of the lounge is disturbed, their other activities (scrabble, card games etc.) impeded
    bullet some schemes may have a games room or an otherwise under‑used room; this may provide greater privacy
    bullet project leaders/resident users/scheme manager must negotiate with the whole community of residents
    bullet installation of the computer has a number of prerequisites:
    bullet a table to stand it on (a folding card table may be adequate, the sideboard is not)
    bullet appropriate chairs
    bullet lighting may need adjustment
    bullet extra power points and telephone sockets may be needed; (for taster sessions, have extension leads!)
    bullet for a (quasi) permanently sited computer security is an issue
    bullet lock it to the wall or fixture
    bullet have it covered by V if installed
    bullet locate it within sight of the scheme manager's office
    bullet ensure that it is not easily visible through external windows
    bullet ensure that any loss is covered by insurance
    bullet increase vigilance and control over visitors to the scheme
    bullet but residents will want access to the computer!
    bullet will this be available at all times?
    bullet will this be available only during the scheme manager's working day (residents often express a wish to use the computer in the evenings and at weekends when they are more likely to feel lonely)
    bullet will the computer be accessible to residents only/residents' invitees/other nonresident class members?
    bullet rules will be needed/a rota established to ensure fair access to all; (schemes often already have a laundry rota)

    9. After the project?

    a) 'Taster sessions' ‑ these are one‑off events; the intention is to demystify ICT

    bullet most participants respond favourably to the session ‑ but many wish to go no further, being satisfied by understanding what ICT is; (one can watch a travelogue without wanting to book one's next holiday to the place described)
    bullet a few will want to continue; but how? ‑ some may be motivated and acquire and install their own computer (without a telephone link one can only word process; not use e‑mail or internet) and learn on their own with the help of kin, friends etc.
    bullet some will consider attending formal adult education classes etc.; but many will feel that they are ill equipped to join such classes
    bullet similarly, they are nervous about trying to use public computer facilities e.g. in their local library or cybercafe 
    bullet there seems to be a need for an intermediate programme which can bridge the gap between the initial lessons and the stage when one feels comfortably competent; (trainers give different estimates of the time needed; it will obviously vary between individuals; '10 sessions' might be a rough average)
    bullet one possibility has been with an informal group which meets regularly, with minimal tutorial support but considerable mutual support
    bullet as an alternative to a computer, ICT may be used via TV or mobile phone; these advantages were not explored in this workshop

    b) A scheme based project

    bullet

    a scheme based project is usually larger, including several (but still too few) training sessions, and leaves the computer in the scheme; at the end of the project there may well be 5 - 10 interested users some of this group may acquire their own computer

    bullet

    either, they may then withdraw from the group

    bullet

    or, they may continue social interaction with other members of the group in a 'computer club'

    bullet

    others will wish to continue to use the communal computer, and in so doing create a computer club; membership of this 'club' must be defined

    bullet

    named users of the communal computer

    bullet

    other residents owning their computer (or using other computers e.g. in library, cybercafes, at friends' homes

    bullet

    other residents who do not themselves use the communal computer but ask other residents to undertake tasks for them (e.g. send an e-mail)

    10) Club organisation

bullet

If such a club is formed it must create an organisation/structure/ constitution ‑ re: access ‑who may use the communal computer and when ‑ re: cost

bullet

in the period of the initial project few, if any costs, fall to the residents; the computer is funded/donated, the training is provided free subsequently the 'club' will be responsible for:

bullet

recurrent costs ‑ telephone link, internet access ‑ paper and ink for printer ‑ rent of scheme space ‑insurance ‑ maintenance ‑ repairs ‑ updating existing equipment ‑ more computers (with attendant need for furniture, outlets, space etc.)

bullet

legal liabilities re:

                   ‑ individual liability for damage

                   ‑ inadequate virus protection

                   ‑ improper use (e.g. pornography)

                   ‑ infringement of copyright

These liabilities may be limited by use of passwords, filtering out of certain material etc. costs may be borne in a number of ways:

bullet

some may be included with the scheme's standing charge; (but non‑user/'club' members may object)

bullet

the 'computer club' may be incorporated within the scheme's social club (perhaps providing some contribution to social club funds); social club funds are frequently used for outings, Christmas parties ‑ and also computer usage ‑ which do not benefit all residents equally if the computer club remains separate from the scheme's social club some means must be found of apportioning costs incurred between 'club' members; (by usage, type of club membership etc.) 

Development of a Resource Centre

bullet

Once a computer club/users group becomes firmly established it may wish to open its facilities more readily to non‑residents of the scheme, i.e. to become a local community resource centre/cybercafe; this would be in keeping with aspirations that sheltered housing schemes should, in a variety of ways, become more involved in the communities in which they are located.

bullet

prerequisite here is the availability of space, equipment, furniture etc., and the consent of the non‑computer using residents

bullet

rules re: access must be established, re: payments for facilities used must be established

12) The future

bullet The projects presented to the workshop were pilot projects, limited in scale, scope and duration; yet it is anticipated by their funders/sponsers that their success will lead to replication and growth e.g.
bullet 'taster sessions' provided more widely
bullet the development of scheme 'clubs' with more user/members and offering a wider range of facilities
bullet But funding of such projects is problematic (and similar to most other projects)
bullet donations are one‑off events
bullet funders (e.g. national lottery) see their grants as pump‑priming; projects funded should become self sustaining (and replications should not cost as much as the initial project); grants are not intended to subsidise in perpuity the computer use by older people
bullet further applications for project funding are more likely to be successful if they are innovative (original ideas) and collaborative (with other organisations) e.g.
bullet projects involving a number of sheltered housing schemes with more than one managing agency
bullet projects which fit into local authority life‑long‑leaming programmes
bullet projects involving intergenerational activity, with local schools (e.g. reminiscencellocal history projects)
bullet A list of some possible funders and programmes is given in the appendix
bullet A caveat: watch out for age‑restrictions; in some contexts 'adult' means under 65 years ‑ learning is geared to paid employment and not to post‑retirement useful social activity!
bullet continued activity is aided by good media coverage; some of the projects presented at the workshop have been widely reported in both local and national media ‑ press, radio and TV. The impetus for this seems to have come not so much from the project leaders as from the funders who have sought to advertise, variously, their charity, the quality of services provided in their housing, the beneficial impact of a govemmentlvoluntary agency programme.

Conclusion

Training is generally expensive ‑ in terms of equipment and especially of skilled tutors. Whatever the merits of training older people in ICT, in enabling them to enjoy a better quality of life, they will not be given priority over, let us say, training for 30 year olds to assist them to return to paid employment after a period of redundancy, illness, or motherhood, or to enhance their career prospects.

The costs to older people can be substantially reduced by the use of refurbished computers ‑ and there will be an increasing supply of these in the coming years; and by using volunteers, older people themselves.

The biggest problem encountered in the projects presented at this workshop lay in the gap between the original taster session or brief training period and the point at which one feels competent to proceed to formal classes, to owning one's own computer, to using a 'public' computer in library, cybereafe, etc. Sheltered housing can provide the solution a communally owned computer, readily accessible and a peer support group.

APPENDIX

Some contacts:

Speakers:

‑ Ann Brogan and Jenny Foulger, Housing Needs Department, Town Hall, Watford, WD 17 3EX. Ann: tel. 0 1923 225400 ext. 263 3, fax 0 1923 246804, email aunb@watford‑council.goy.uk Jenny: tel 0 1923 67008 1, email Jenny2000hotmail.com

‑ Frances Cambrook, School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset House, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB

‑ Teresa Gallagher, Sir Oswald Stoll Foundation, 446 Fulharn Road, London SW6 lDT. Tel 020 7385 2110, fax 020 7381 7484, email Sto11446@AOLCOM

‑ Sue Warr, Age Concern Bournemouth, 700 Wimbourne Road, Bournemouth BH9 2EG. Tel 01202 530530, fax 01202 530598, email Bournemouth@ageconcern.org.uk

‑ Gwyneth Bryant and lan Betts, Age Concern East Sussex, 54 Cliffe High Street, Lewes BN7 2AN. Tel 01273 476704, fax 01273 486833, email gwyneth.bryant@ageconcern.org.uk

‑ Peter Stanley, 50 McWilliam Road, Woodingdean, Brighton BN2 6BE, email peter. stanley@cwcom.net

‑ Teresa Gittins, Sussex RCC, 212 High Street, Lewes BN7 2NA. Tel 0 1273 473422

Other:

‑ Better Government for Older People, The Technology Centre, Wolverhampton Science Park, Wolverhampton WV 10 9RU. Tel 0 1902 824270

‑ Age Resource, Astral House, 1268 London Road, London SW16 4ER. Tel 020 87657610

‑ NIACE (National Institute of Adult and Continuing Education) Older and Bolder Programme, 21 De Montfort Street, Leicester LEI 7GE

‑ Technology for Living Forum UK (promoted by Counsel and Care, and Help the Aged), The Old Chapel, Bell Lane, Cassington, Witney, Oxon OX8 IDS. Tel 01865 884137

‑ Centre for Sheltered Housing Studies, I" Floor Elgar House, Shrub Hill Road, Worcester VvR4 9EE, tel. 0 1905 2115 5 (CSHA has a project to install computers in New Islington and Hackney HA schemes)

Refurbished computers:

‑ Recycle‑IT! Limited, c/o SKI` (UK) Ltd, Sundou Park Road, Luton, Beds. LU3 3BL, tel. 01582 492436

‑ CRASH UK Ltd, 7th Floor, New England House, New England Street, Brighton BN1 4GH